<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>
<rfc number="4819" category="std">
	<front>
		<title>Secure Shell Public Key Subsystem</title>


		<author initials="J.G." surname="Galbraith" fullname="Joseph Galbraith">
			<organization>VanDyke Software</organization>
			<address>
				<postal>
					<street>4848 Tramway Ridge Blvd</street>
					<street>Suite 101</street>
					<city>Albuquerque</city><region>NM</region>
					<code>87111</code>
					<country>US</country>
				</postal>
				<phone>+1 505 332 5700</phone>
				<email>galb@vandyke.com</email>
			</address>
		</author>

		<author initials="J.P.V" surname="Van Dyke" fullname="Jeff P. Van Dyke">
			<organization>VanDyke Software</organization>
			<address>
				<postal>
					<street>4848 Tramway Ridge Blvd</street>
					<street>Suite 101</street>
					<city>Albuquerque</city><region>NM</region>
					<code>87111</code>
					<country>US</country>
				</postal>
				<phone>+1 505 332 5700</phone>
				<email>jpv@vandyke.com</email>
			</address>
		</author>


		<author initials="B.D.M" surname="McClure" fullname="Brent McClure">
			<organization>VanDyke Software</organization>
			<address>
				<postal>
					<street>4848 Tramway Ridge Blvd</street>
					<street>Suite 101</street>
					<city>Albuquerque</city><region>NM</region>
					<code>87111</code>
					<country>US</country>
				</postal>
				<phone>+1 505 332 5700</phone>
				<email>bdmccl@yahoo.com</email>
			</address>
		</author>


		<author initials="J.E" surname="Bright" fullname="Jon Bright">
			<organization>Silicon Circus</organization>
			<address>
				<postal>
					<street>24 Jubilee Road</street>
					<city>Chichester</city><region>West Sussex</region>
					<code>PO19 7XB</code>
					<country>UK</country>
				</postal>
				<phone>+49 172 524 0521</phone>
				<email>jon@siliconcircus.com</email>
			</address>
		</author>

		<date month="February" year="2007"/>

		<area>Security</area>
		<workgroup>Secure Shell Working Group</workgroup>
		<keyword>SSH</keyword>
		<keyword>SSH2</keyword>

		<abstract>
			<t>Secure Shell defines a user authentication mechanism that is based on public
   			keys, but does not define any mechanism for key distribution.
			No common key management solution exists in current implementations.
			This document describes a protocol that can be used to configure
			public keys in an implementation-independent fashion, allowing
			client software to take on the burden of this configuration.</t>

			<t>The Public Key Subsystem provides a server-independent mechanism
			for clients to add public keys, remove public keys, and list
			the current public keys known by the server. Rights to manage
			public keys are specific and limited to the authenticated user.</t>

			<t>A public key may also be associated with various restrictions,
			including a mandatory command or subsystem.</t>
		</abstract>
	</front>

	<middle>
		<section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
			<t>Secure Shell (SSH) is a protocol for secure remote login and other secure network
			services over an insecure network. Secure Shell defines a user authentication
			mechanism that is based on public keys, but does not define any
			mechanism for key distribution. Common practice is to authenticate
			once with password authentication and transfer the public key to the
			server.  However, to date no two implementations use the same
			mechanism to configure a public key for use.</t>

			<t>This document describes a subsystem that can be used to configure
			public keys in an implementation-independent fashion. This approach
			allows client software to take on the burden of this configuration.
			The Public Key Subsystem protocol is designed for extreme simplicity
			in implementation. It is not intended as a
			Public Key Infrastructure for X.509
			Certificates (PKIX) replacement.</t>

			<t>The Secure Shell Public Key Subsystem has been designed to run on
			top of the Secure Shell transport layer <xref target="RFC4253"/>
			and user authentication protocols <xref target="RFC4252"/>.
			It provides a simple mechanism for the client to manage public keys on
			the server.</t>

			<t>This document should be read only after reading the Secure Shell
			architecture <xref target="RFC4251"/> and
			Secure Shell connection <xref target="RFC4254"/> documents.</t>

			<t>This protocol is intended to be used from the Secure Shell 
			Connection Protocol <xref target="RFC4254"/> as a subsystem, 
			as described in the section "Starting a Shell or a Command". The 
			subsystem name used with this protocol is "publickey".</t>

			<t>This protocol requires that the user be able to authenticate in some
			fashion before it can be used. If password authentication is used,
			servers SHOULD provide a configuration option to disable the use of
			password authentication after the first public key is added.</t>
		</section>

		<section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
			<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
			"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
			document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119">
			RFC 2119</xref>.</t>
		</section>

		<section anchor="overview" title="Public Key Subsystem Overview">
			<t>The Public Key Subsystem provides a server-independent mechanism for
			clients to add public keys, remove public keys, and list the current
			public keys known by the server.  The subsystem name is
			"publickey".</t>
<?rfc needLines="3" ?>
			<t>The public keys added, removed, and listed using this protocol are
			specific and limited to those of the authenticated user.</t>

			<t>The operations to add, remove, and list the authenticated user's
			public keys are performed as request packets sent to the server. The server
			sends response packets that indicate success or failure as well as provide
			specific response data.</t>

			<t>The format of public key blobs are detailed in Section 6.6, "Public Key
			Algorithms" of the SSH Transport Protocol document <xref target="RFC4253"/>.</t>

			<section anchor="open" title="Opening the Public Key Subsystem">
				<t>The Public Key Subsystem is started by a client sending an
				SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST over an existing session's channel.</t>
				
				<t>The details of how a session is opened are described in the
				SSH Connection Protocol document <xref target="RFC4254"/>
				in the section "Opening a Session".</t>

				<t>To open the Public Key Subsystem, the client sends:</t>

				<artwork>
     byte      SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST
     uint32    recipient channel
     string    "subsystem"
     boolean   want reply
     string    "publickey"
				</artwork>

				<t>Client implementations SHOULD reject this request; it is
				normally sent only by the client.</t>

				<t>If want reply is TRUE, the server MUST respond with
				SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS if the Public Key Subsystem was successfully
				started, or SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE if the server failed to start or
				does not support the Public Key Subsystem.</t>

				<t>The server SHOULD respond with SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE if the
				user is not allowed access to the Public Key Subsystem (for example, 
				because the user authenticated with a restricted public key).</t>

				<t>It is RECOMMENDED that clients request and check the reply for
				this request.</t>
			</section>
<?rfc needLines="10" ?>
			<section anchor="requests" title="Requests and Responses">
				<t>All Public Key Subsystem requests and responses are sent in the 
				following form:</t>

				<artwork>
     uint32    length
     string    name
     ... request/response specific data follows
				</artwork>

				<t>The length field describes the
				length of the name field and of the
				request/response-specific data, but does not include the length of the 
				length field itself.  The client MUST receive acknowledgement of each 
				request prior to sending a new request.</t>

				<t>The version packet, as well as all requests and responses described 
				in <xref target="operations"/>, are a description of the 'name' field and 
				the data part of the packet.</t>
			</section>

			<section anchor="statusresponse" title="The Status Message">
				<t>A request is acknowledged by sending a status packet. If there is
				data in response to the request, the status packet is sent after
				all data has been sent.</t>

				<artwork>
     string    "status"
     uint32    status code
     string    description [7]
     string    language tag [6]
				</artwork>

				<t>A status message MUST be sent for any unrecognized packets, and the
				request SHOULD NOT close the subsystem.</t>

				<section anchor="statuscodes" title="Status Codes">
					<t>The status code gives the status in a more machine-readable format
					(suitable for localization), and can have the following values:</t>

					<artwork>
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_SUCCESS                      0
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_ACCESS_DENIED                1
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_STORAGE_EXCEEDED             2
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_VERSION_NOT_SUPPORTED        3
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_KEY_NOT_FOUND                4
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_KEY_NOT_SUPPORTED            5
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_KEY_ALREADY_PRESENT          6
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_GENERAL_FAILURE              7
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_REQUEST_NOT_SUPPORTED        8
     SSH_PUBLICKEY_ATTRIBUTE_NOT_SUPPORTED      9
					</artwork>

					<t>If a request completed successfully, the server MUST send the 
					status code SSH_PUBLICKEY_SUCCESS.  The meaning of the failure codes 
					is as implied by their names.</t>
				</section>
			</section>

<?rfc needLines="7" ?>
			<section anchor="version" title="The Version Packet">
				<t>Both sides MUST start a connection by sending a version packet that
				indicates the version of the protocol they are using.</t>

				<artwork>
     string "version"
     uint32 protocol-version-number
				</artwork>

        <t>This document describes version 2 of the protocol.  Version 1 was used
        by an early draft of this document.  The version number was incremented
        after changes in the handling of status packets.</t>

        <t>Both sides send the highest version that they implement.
				The lower of the version numbers is the version of the
				protocol to use.  If either side can't support the lower
				version, it should close the subsystem and notify the other side by
				sending an SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_CLOSE message.  Before closing the
				subsystem, a status message with the status 
				SSH_PUBLICKEY_VERSION_NOT_SUPPORTED SHOULD be sent.  Note that,
				normally, status messages are only sent by the server (in response
				to requests from the client).  This is the only occasion on which
				the client sends a status message.</t>

				<t>Both sides MUST wait to receive this version before
				continuing.  The "version" packet MUST NOT be sent again after
				this initial exchange.  The SSH_PUBLICKEY_VERSION_NOT_SUPPORTED
				status code must not be sent in response to any other request.</t>

				<t>Implementations MAY use the first 15 bytes of the version 
				packet as a "magic cookie" to avoid processing spurious output 
				from the user's shell (as described in Section 6.5 of 
				<xref target="RFC4254"/>).  These bytes will always be:</t>

				<t>0x00 0x00 0x00 0x0F 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x07 0x76 0x65 0x72 0x73 0x69 
				0x6F 0x6E</t>
			</section>
		</section>

<?rfc needLines="20" ?>
		<section anchor="operations" title="Public Key Subsystem Operations">
			<t>The Public Key Subsystem currently defines four operations:
			add, remove, list, and listattributes.</t>


			<section anchor="add" title="Adding a Public Key">

				<t>If the client wishes to add a public key, the client sends:</t>

				<artwork>
     string    "add"
     string    public key algorithm name
     string    public key blob
     boolean   overwrite
     uint32    attribute-count
      string    attrib-name
      string    attrib-value
      bool      critical
     repeated attribute-count times
				</artwork>

				<t>The server MUST attempt to store the public key for the user in the
				appropriate location so the public key can be used for subsequent
				public key authentications.  If the overwrite field is false and the
				specified key already exists, the server MUST return
				SSH_PUBLICKEY_KEY_ALREADY_PRESENT.  If the server returns this, the
				client SHOULD provide an option to the user to overwrite the key.  If
				the overwrite field is true and the
				specified key already exists, but
				cannot be overwritten, the server MUST return 
				SSH_PUBLICKEY_ACCESS_DENIED.</t>

				<t>Attribute names are defined following the same scheme laid out for
				algorithm names in <xref target="RFC4251"/>.  If
				the server does not implement a critical attribute, it MUST fail the add,
				with the status code SSH_PUBLICKEY_ATTRIBUTE_NOT_SUPPORTED.
				For the purposes of a critical attribute, mere storage of the attribute is not
				sufficient -- rather, the server must understand and implement the
				intent of the attribute.</t>

				<t>The following attributes are currently defined:</t>

				<t>"comment"</t>

				<t>The value of the comment attribute contains user-specified text about 
				the public key.  The server SHOULD make every effort to preserve this
				value and return it with the key during any subsequent list operation.
				The server MUST NOT attempt to interpret or act upon the content of the
				comment field in any way.  The comment attribute must be specified in
				UTF-8 format <xref target="RFC3629"/>.</t>

				<t>The comment field is useful so the user can identify the key without 
				resorting to comparing its fingerprint.  This attribute SHOULD NOT be
				critical.</t>

				<t>"comment-language"</t>

				<t>If this attribute is specified, it MUST immediately follow a "comment"
				attribute and specify the language for that attribute 
				<xref target="RFC4646"/>.  The client MAY specify more than one comment
				if it additionally specifies a different language for each of those
				comments.  The server SHOULD attempt
				to store each comment with
				its language attribute.  This attribute SHOULD NOT be critical.
				</t>

				<t>"command-override"</t>

				<t>"command-override" specifies a command to be executed when this key is
				in use.  The command should be executed by the server when it receives an
				"exec" or "shell" request from the client, in place of the command or
				shell which would otherwise have been executed as a result of that
				request.  If the command string is empty, both "exec" and "shell" requests
				should be denied.  If no "command-override" attribute is specified, all
				"exec" and "shell" requests should be permitted (as long as they satisfy
				other security or authorization checks the server may perform).  This
				attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>

				<t>"subsystem"</t>

				<t>"subsystem" specifies a comma-separated list of subsystems that may
				be started (using a "subsystem" request) when this key is in use.  This
				attribute SHOULD be critical.  If the value is empty, no subsystems may
				be started.  If the "subsystem" attribute is not specified, no restrictions
				are placed on which subsystems may be started when authenticated using this
				key.</t>

				<t>"x11"</t>

				<t>"x11" specifies that X11 forwarding may not be performed when this key
				is in use.  The attribute-value field SHOULD be empty for this attribute.
				This attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>

				<t>"shell"</t>

				<t>"shell" specifies that session channel "shell" requests should be
				denied when this key is in use.  The attribute-value field SHOULD be empty
				for this attribute.  This attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>
<?rfc needLines="5" ?>
				<t>"exec"</t>

				<t>"exec" specifies that session channel "exec" requests should be denied
				when this key is in use.  The attribute-value field SHOULD be empty for
				this attribute.  This attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>

				<t>"agent"</t>

				<t>"agent" specifies that session channel "auth-agent-req" requests should
				be denied when this key is in use.  The attribute-value field SHOULD be
				empty for this attribute.  This attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>

				<t>"env"</t>

				<t>"env" specifies that session channel "env" requests should be denied
				when this key is in use.  The attribute-value field SHOULD be empty for
				this attribute.  This attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>
<?rfc needLines="5" ?>
				<t>"from"</t>
				
				<t>"from" specifies a comma-separated list of hosts from which the key may
				be used.  If a host not in this list attempts to use this key for
				authorization purposes, the authorization attempt MUST be denied.  The
				server SHOULD make a log entry regarding this.  The server MAY provide a
				method for administrators to disallow the appearance of a host in this 
				list.  The server should use whatever method is appropriate for its platform
				to identify the host -- e.g., for IP-based networks, checking the IP address 
				or performing a reverse DNS lookup.  For IP-based networks, it is anticipated
				that each element of the "from" parameter will take the form of a specific IP 
				address or hostname.</t>
				
				<t>"port-forward"</t>

				<t>"port-forward" specifies that no "direct-tcpip" requests should be
				accepted, except those to hosts specified in the comma-separated list
				supplied as a value to this attribute.  If the value of this attribute is
				empty, all "direct-tcpip" requests should be refused when using this key.
				This attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>

				<t>"reverse-forward"</t>

				<t>"reverse-forward" specifies that no "tcpip-forward" requests should be
				accepted, except for the port numbers in the comma-separated list supplied
				as a value to this attribute.  If the value of this attribute is empty,
				all "tcpip-forward" requests should be refused when using this key.  This
				attribute SHOULD be critical.</t>


				<t>In addition to the attributes specified by the client, the server MAY
				provide a method for administrators to enforce certain
				attributes compulsorily.</t>
			</section>

			<section anchor="remove" title="Removing a Public Key">

				<t>If the client wishes to remove a public key, the client sends:</t>

				<artwork>
     string    "remove"
     string    public key algorithm name
     string    public key blob
				</artwork>

				<t>The server MUST attempt to remove the public key for the user from
				the appropriate location, so that the public key cannot be used for
				subsequent authentications.</t>
			</section>

			<section anchor="list" title="Listing Public Keys">

				<t>If the client wishes to list the known public keys, the client sends:</t>

				<artwork>
     string    "list"
				</artwork>

				<t>The server will respond with zero or more of the following responses:</t>

				<artwork>
     string    "publickey"
     string    public key algorithm name
     string    public key blob
     uint32    attribute-count
      string    attrib-name
      string    attrib-value
     repeated attribute-count times
				</artwork>

				<t>There is no requirement that the responses be in any particular order.  Whilst
				some server implementations may send the responses in some order, client
				implementations should not rely on responses being in any order.</t>

				<t>Following the last "publickey" response, a status packet MUST be sent.</t>

				<t>Implementations SHOULD support this request.</t>
			</section>

			<section anchor="listattributes" title="Listing Server Capabilities">

				<t>If the client wishes to know which key attributes the server supports,
				it sends:</t>

				<artwork>
     string    "listattributes"
				</artwork>

				<t>The server will respond with zero or more of the following responses:
				</t>

				<artwork>
     string    "attribute"
     string    attribute name
     boolean   compulsory
				</artwork>

				<t>The "compulsory" field indicates whether this attribute will be 
				compulsorily applied to any added keys (irrespective of whether the
				attribute has been specified by the client) due to administrative
				settings on the server.  If the server does not support administrative
				settings of this nature, it MUST return false in the compulsory field.

				An example of use of the "compulsory" attribute would be a server with
				a configuration file specifying that the user is not permitted shell
				access.  Given this, the server would return the "shell" attribute,
				with "compulsory" marked true.  Whatever attributes the user subsequently
				asked the server to apply to their key, the server would also apply
				the "shell" attribute, rendering it impossible for the user to use
				a shell.</t>

				<t>Following the last "attribute" response, a status packet MUST be sent.
				</t>
				
				<t>An implementation MAY choose not to support this request.</t>
			</section>
		</section>
		<section anchor="security" title="Security Considerations">

			<t>This protocol assumes that it is run over a secure channel and that the
			endpoints of the channel have been authenticated.  Thus, this protocol
			assumes that it is externally protected from network-level attacks.</t>

			<t>This protocol provides a mechanism that allows client authentication
			data to be uploaded and manipulated. It is the responsibility of the server
			implementation to enforce any access controls that may be required to limit
			the access allowed for any particular user (the user being authenticated
			externally to this protocol, typically using the SSH User Authentication
			Protocol <xref target="RFC4252"/>).  In particular, it
			is possible for users to overwrite an existing key on the server with this
			protocol, whilst at the same time specifying fewer restrictions for the new
			key than were previously present.  Servers should take care that when doing
			this, clients are not able to override presets from the server's 
			administrator.</t>

			<t>This protocol requires the client to assume that the server will
			correctly implement and observe attributes applied to keys.  Implementation
			errors in the server could cause clients to authorize keys for access they
			were not intended to have, or to apply fewer restrictions than were 
			intended.</t>
		</section>
		<section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
			<t>This section contains conventions used in naming the namespaces, the initial
			state of the registry, and instructions for future assignments.</t>

			<section title="Registrations">
				<t>Consistent with Section 4.9.5 of <xref target="RFC4250"/>, this document makes the
				following registration:</t>
<!-- RFC Editor Comment: RFCs 4250 - 4254 compose a set of documents
in which RFC 4250 specifies the IANA required actions for the rest of
the documents.  We see you have chosen to reference RFC 4251 here,
but the IANA site (http://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters)
specifies "[per RFC4250]".  Please consider whether you want to cite 
RFC 4250 to match what is listed on the IANA site. -->

<!-- RFC Editor Comment: There is a discrepancy regarding the
documents usage and IANAs usage of the term "public-key".  For
example, Section 6.3 is titled "Public-Key Subsystem Request Names",
but IANA has titled this registry "Publickey Subsystem Request Names".
Please review the use of "publickey" vs "public-key" (i.e., with or
without the hyphen) thoughout the document. --> 
 
				<t>The subsystem name "publickey".</t>
			</section>

			<section title="Names">
				<t>In the following sections, the values for the namespaces are textual.  
				The conventions and instructions to the IANA for future assignments
				are given in this section.  The initial assignments are given in their
				respective sections.</t>

<section title="Conventions for Names">
<t>All names registered by the IANA in the following sections 
MUST be printable US-ASCII strings, and MUST NOT contain the
characters
<vspace blankLines="0" />
at-sign ("@"), comma (","), or whitespace or control
characters (ASCII codes 32 or less).  Names are case-sensitive, and
MUST NOT be longer than 64 characters.</t>

					<t>A provision is made here for locally extensible names.  The IANA
					will not register and will not control names with the at-sign 
					in them.  Names with the at-sign in them will have the format of
					"name@domainname" (without the double quotes) where the part preceding
					the at-sign is the name.  The format of the part preceding
					the at-sign is not specified; however, these names MUST be
					printable US-ASCII strings, and MUST NOT contain the comma
					character (","), or whitespace, or control characters (ASCII
					codes 32 or less).  The part following the at-sign MUST be a
					valid, fully qualified Internet domain name <xref target="RFC1034"/>
					controlled by the person or organization defining the name.  Names are
					case-sensitive, and MUST NOT be longer than 64 characters.  It
					is up to each domain how it manages its local namespace.  It
					has been noted that these names resemble <xref target="RFC0822">STD 11</xref>
					email addresses.  This is purely coincidental and actually has
					nothing to do with <xref target="RFC0822">STD 11</xref>.  An example of
					a locally defined name is "our-attribute@example.com" (without the
					double quotes).</t>
				</section>

				<section title="Future Assignments of Names">
					<t>Requests for assignments of new Names
					MUST be done through the IETF Consensus method as described
					in <xref target="RFC2434"/>.</t>
				</section>
			</section>

			<section title="Public Key Subsystem Request Names">
				<t>The following table lists the initial assignments of Public Key Subsystem
				Request names.</t>
				<artwork>
        Request Name
        -------------
        version
        add
        remove
        list
        listattributes
				</artwork>
			</section>

			<section title="Public Key Subsystem Response Names">
				<t>The following table lists the initial assignments of Public Key Subsystem
				Response names.</t>
				<artwork>
        Response Name
        --------------
        version
        status
        publickey
        attribute
				</artwork>
			</section>

			<section title="Public Key Subsystem Attribute Names">
				<t>Attributes are used to define properties or restrictions for public keys.
				The following table lists the initial assignments of Public Key Subsystem
				Attribute names.</t>
				<artwork>
        Attribute Name
        ---------------
        comment
        comment-language
        command-override
        subsystem
        x11
        shell
        exec
        agent
        env
        from
        port-forward
        reverse-forward
				</artwork>
			</section>

			<section title="Public Key Subsystem Status Codes">
				<t>The status code is a byte value, describing the status of a request.</t>

				<section title="Conventions">
					<t>Status responses have status codes in the range 0 to 255.
					These numbers are allocated as follows.  Of these, the range
					192 to 255 is reserved for use by local, private extensions.</t>
				</section>

				<section title="Initial Assignments">
					<t>The following table identifies the initial assignments of
					the Public Key Subsystem status code values.</t>
					<artwork>
        Status code                           Value    Reference
        ------------                          -----    ---------
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_SUCCESS                   0
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_ACCESS_DENIED             1
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_STORAGE_EXCEEDED          2
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_VERSION_NOT_SUPPORTED     3
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_KEY_NOT_FOUND             4
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_KEY_NOT_SUPPORTED         5
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_KEY_ALREADY_PRESENT       6
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_GENERAL_FAILURE           7
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_REQUEST_NOT_SUPPORTED     8
        SSH_PUBLICKEY_ATTRIBUTE_NOT_SUPPORTED   9
					</artwork>
				</section>

<?rfc needLines="8" ?>
				<section title="Future Assignments">
					<t>Requests for assignments of new status codes in the range of 0 to
					191 MUST be done through the Standards Action method as described in 
					<xref target="RFC2434"/>.</t>

					<t>The IANA will not control the status code range of 192 through 255.
					This range is for private use.</t>
				</section>
			</section>
		</section>
	</middle>

	<back>
		<references title="Normative References">
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4251.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4253.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4252.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4254.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4646.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.3629.xml" ?>
		</references>
		<references title="Informative References">
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4250.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.0822.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.1034.xml" ?>
			<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2434.xml" ?>
		</references>
	</back>
</rfc>
